Looking over the headlines from today, one major thought kept coming into my mind: When did governments quit serving their people and start controlling them?
The Iranian government is still holding protesters arrested after the election dispute. Charles Taylor, the former Liberian president accused of atrocious war crimes denied everything at the International Criminal Court. I talked to a South Carolinian today who said their governor missed some very important meetings recently because he is taking time to reconcile with his wife for his unfaithfulness (while unemployment is soaring in SC). Coal companies benefit more from the climate bill that the House passed than the environment does.
So my question is again when did governments stop serving people? Even better, how did we let this happen?
After thinking about this, I realized maybe I was wrong. Maybe I misunderstood what government means. So I looked up the definition. And it focuses mostly on control, not service: "the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states". I disagree.
Government is about service. It is about taking care of the people one is elected to represent. It is about representing them fairly.
Maybe I am too idealistic, maybe I am just a dreamer, but as John Lennon says: "I'm not the only one." Join us. Let's create a better world.
-Stephen Donahoe







Well Stephen....you're not the only one.... that is too "idealistic" .......many more of the world are so inclined....I have found, in my wanderings through life, that I am returning to my idealism....it helps to have a good leadership....hope that things can be as they should, not as they "have to be" or that we have accept reasoning based on "facing reality".....
It seems to me that we must establish the "ideal" as a real life expectaion and accept compromise off of the ideal, rather than "live with reality" and try to move our thinking up from a already compromised position/thinking.....a life time of living in reality is a depressing thought....our ideals, our hopes are what kindle the flame within us....what nourishes the fellowship of our world....binds our common spirits....
Our inner knowledge of the way things "should be" must be our voiced expression of how we expect things to be, our inner knowledge, must become our standard of measurement for our "ideal reality"....so that the other "ones" around us will see and respond...
Thank you for sharing yours....Mike
Posted by: mike king | July 21, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Stephen, it looks like you are referring to a representative style government, which, in my opinion shouldn't "take care of" their constituents, but should represent them. A Government isn't a care-giver but an administrative system.
Obviously, government shouldn't be corrupt, but if an official's constituents want the goverment to punish political activists, that's what the official should do.
I guess I'm saying, while it seems cold, I think the dictionary is right. If there is a fault with government, then it is due to the inaction or inatentiveness of its people. In a representative government system, if the elected officials aren't doing what they are supposed to, we're supposed to kick 'em out and put in people who do.
Unfortunately, in the US, the general population is (a) uneducated (b) poor and (c) disengaged. This is a bad combination for a good representative government. But its not "government's" fault - it's the people's fault.
In a democratic society, we truly get the government we deserve.
Posted by: bewarethechicken | July 24, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Mike, thank you so much for sharing your insight and wisdom! Let's continue to strive to make the ideal real.
Posted by: Stephen Donahoe | September 04, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Bewarethechicken,
To some extent, I agree with you. I agree that in a truly democratic society, the people get the government they deserve. However, I disagree that the US has a truly democratic society. In a democratic society, everyone is supposed to have equal access to voting and running for public office. When the average networth of a member of Congress is at least $2.9 million, it is obvious that national office is reserved for a certain group of people. And it is also easy to see how that group of people would find it easy to ignore the needs of the people. (Stat from http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/57139-kerry-issa-harman-most-wealthy-new-kids-of-09-are-rich-kids-too)
Posted by: Stephen Donahoe | September 04, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Houses and cars are not cheap and not every person can buy it. However, business loans was created to aid different people in such hard situations.
Posted by: BergerDollie24 | May 21, 2010 at 06:56 PM
I think so this post is very interesting and usefull for all us. We must follow this every time.
Posted by: Corbin | September 20, 2010 at 04:54 AM
Moncler Women's Nantes Hooded White Long Down Coat is a brand that rush to fashion world with unbelievable speed. Though famous to the world as Moncler clothing, bags and boots are also provided to match with clothes. Clever people likes the matches as a perfet suit for moncler.Here, I would like to recommend Moncler clothing to accompany in cold days. It’s an new brand in clothing world for Moncler clothing world. The features of Moncler Jacket is that all clothes are only for cold days. For the appearance,Moncler Loire Women Long Down Jacket Blue clothes show shiny skins but feel mild and warm. People don’t need to worry about the quality, as all sewing machines were bought from abroad and clothes will be tested and double checked before take out to sell. Moncler Jassen are sold the best for all Moncler products.Do you feel cold now? If it’s normal as past in your country, the temperature should be lower than days before, as it’s in deep winter. We wear more and more clothes, not only thicker, but also more pieces. Personally,Moncler Women's Bottom A Long Jacket In Brown are the best choice for us to wear for the cool wth little cold winter days.
Posted by: moncler | November 18, 2011 at 03:01 AM